Research-based learning (RBL) based on digital learning environment (DLE) in the context of TPACK proficiency among prospective mathematics teachers viewed from creative thinking ability: A quasi-experimental study
PDF

Keywords

Research-Based Learning (RBL)
Digital Learning Environment (DLE)
TPACK Proficiency
Prospective Mathematics Teachers
Creative Thinking Ability

How to Cite

Puput Suriyah, Sujiran, Dwi Erna Novianti, Ali Noeruddin, & Dina Mariana. (2025). Research-based learning (RBL) based on digital learning environment (DLE) in the context of TPACK proficiency among prospective mathematics teachers viewed from creative thinking ability: A quasi-experimental study. Proceeding International Conference on Digital Education and Social Science, 2(1), 354–370. Retrieved from https://prosiding.appipgri.id/index.php/icdess/article/view/88

Abstract

This article presents an experimental study conducted to examine the impact of a research-based learning (RBL) approach based on a digital learning environment (DLE) on the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) proficiency and creative thinking abilities of prospective mathematics teachers. The study aims to prepare these teachers for the Society 5.0 era and support the government's educational initiatives. The researchers integrated a DLE consisting of an integrated website with a Learning Management System (LMS) Moodle, which included e-modules, quizzes, and other resources. The study also emphasizes the importance of character development and the need for teachers to possess strong TPACK knowledge and creative thinking skills. The TPACK framework, which encompasses pedagogical content knowledge, technological pedagogical knowledge, technological content knowledge, and technological pedagogical content knowledge, is considered crucial for effective technology integration in teaching. The researchers conducted a quasi-experimental study using a 3 x 3 factorial design to investigate the influence of different instructional models on TPACK capabilities among students at different stages of creative thinking skills. The study collected data through documentation, observation, interviews, and tests. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc multiple comparisons. The findings of the study contribute to the advancement of education and align with the goals of the Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) initiative, emphasizing innovation, collaboration, and sustainable practices in education.

PDF

References

Agyei, D. D., & Keengwe, J. (2014). Using technology pedagogical content knowledge development to enhance learning outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 19, 155-171. doi:10.1007/s10639-012-9204-1.

Al-Qallaf CL, Al-Mutairi ASR. (2016). Digital literacy and digital content supports learning: The impact of blogs on teaching English as a foreign language. Electron Libr

Angelie, C. Valanides N. (2015). Technology Pedagogic Content Knowledge Exploring, Developing, and Assesing TPCK. Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London. ISBN 978-1-4899-8079-3 ISBN 978-1-4899- 8080-9 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-8080-9.

Barana, A., Marchisio, M., & Sacchet, M. (2021). Interactive feedback for learning mathematics in a digital learning environment. Education Sciences, 11(6), 279.

Benton, L., Hoyles, C., Kalas, I., & Noss, R. (2017). Bridging primary programming and mathematics: Some findings of design research in England. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3, 115-138. Doi:10.1007/s40751-017- 0028-x.

Budiyono. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press.

Budiyono. (2009). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press.

Budiyono. (2011). Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press.

Chai C-S, Koh JH-L, Tsai C-C. (2017). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.

Chambers, D., Thiekotter, A., & Chambers, L. (2013). Preparing Student Nurses for Contemporery Practice: The Case for Discovery Learning. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 9 (3), 106-113.

Dafik. (2015). Handbook for the implementation of RBL in the Courses. Jember: Universitas Jember.

Gotoh, G. (2004, July). The quality of the reasoning in problem solving processes. In The 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 4-11). http://www.icme-10.com/conference/2_paperreports /3_section.

Grant, G. (1981). The character of education and the education of character. Daedalus, 135-149.

Gündoğdu, K., Üstündağ, N., Altın, M., Eken, M., Yolcu, O., & Çırakoğlu, M. (2019). Teachers’ views on character/values education in schools. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 8(3), 14-28.

Hauk, S., Jackson, B., Toney, A., Nair, R., & Tsay, J. J. (2014). Developing a Model Of Pedagogical Content Knowledge For Secondary And Post-Secondary Mathematics Instruction. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 2, A16- A40.

Jaipal-Jamani, K, Figg, C., Collier, D., Gallagher, T., Winters, K., & Ciampa, K. (2018). Developing TPACK of university faculty through technology leadership roles. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 39-55. doi: 10.17471/2499-4324/984.

Jason T. Abbitt (2011). Measuring Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Preservice Teacher Education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281-300, DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2011.10782573.

Khan Samia. (2011). New Pedagogies on Teaching Science with Computer Simulations. J Sci Educ Technol, 20, 215–232. DOI 10.1007/s10956-010-9247-2.

Lin, M. H., Chen, H. C., & Liu, K. S. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553-3564.

Maeng J, Mulvey B, Smetana L, Bell R. (2013). Preservice teachers’ TPACK: using technology to support inquiry instruction. J Sci Educ Technol, 22, 838–857. doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9434-z.

Meng, C. C., Yew, W. T., Rakhmawati, N., & Suriyah, P. (2020). Mathematics Pre-service Teachers' Learning Experiences of International Teaching Practicum in Indonesia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28(2).

Mukaromah, M.H. (2020). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berdasarkan Research Based Learning dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Metakognisi Mahasiswa Memecahkan Masalah H-Irregularity pada Graf Khusus.

Noskova T, Kulikova S, Yakovleva O. (2020). Management of Students’ Activities in the Digital Learning Environment. In: Ceur Workshop Proceedings, 101–11.

Nuha, M.A., Waluya, S.B., & Junaedi, I. (2018). Mathematical Creative Process Wallas Model in Students Problem Posing with Lesson Study Approach. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 527-538.

Nursofah, Komala, R., & Rusdi. (2018). The Effect of Research Based Learning Model and Creative Thinking Ability on Students Learning Outcomes. Indonesian Journal of Science and Education, 2(2), 168-173, p-ISSN: 2598-5213, e-ISSN: 2598-5205, DOI: 10.31002/ijose.v2i2.584.

Poonpan, S., Suwanmankha, S. (2005). Indicators of research-based learning instructional process: a case study of best practice in a primary school. Proceeding at the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) Annual Conference 2005 (pp. 1–7). NSW: AARE Inc.

Prahmana, R., &Kusumah, Y. (2016). The Hypothetical Learning Trajectory on Research in Mathematics Education Using Research-Based Learning. Pedagogika / Pedagogy 2016, 123(3), 42–54.

Pratama, A. B. (2017). Jurnal Ilmiah sebagai Bahan Pembelajaran Berbasis Riset pada Pendidikan Sarjana Administrasi Negara. Journal of Public Administration and Local Governance, 1(1), September, page 10-19.

Principles N. (2000). Standards for school mathematics Reston, VA Natl. Counc Teach Math.

Puspananda, D. R., & Suriyah, P. (2017). Analisis faktor pada group embbeded figures test untuk mengukur gaya kognitif. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY. UNY.

Puspananda, D. R., & Suriyah, P. (2017). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Laboraturium Dengan Involving Students In Self-And Peer Evaluation Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah Di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 83-94.

Rahim, S. N. A., & Hamzah, R. (2016). E-Jawi: digital learning tool for jawi character recognition. Journal of Computing Technologies and Creative Content (JTeC), 1(1), 55-58.

S.N. Kushner Benson et al. (2015). The Essential Role of Pedagogical Knowledge in Technology Integration for Transformative Teaching and Learning, Handbook of technological pedagogical and content knowledge for educators. Routledge, New York, NY, 3-18.

Safik, M., Yuianti, N., Sarjono, W., & Sa’id, I. A. (2021, March). The development of science, technology, engineering, art, and mathematics learning devices–lesson study for learning community to improve students’ creative thinking skill. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1839(1), pp 012019). IOP Publishing.

Safitri, A. D. (2018). Enhancing senior high school students’ creative thinking skills using project based e-learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), pp 012030. IOP Publishing.

Safitri, D. N., Sujiran, S., Junarti, J., & Suriyah, P. (2017). Permainan Kartu (Card Game) Untuk Menghafal Perkalian Melalui Bimbingan Belajar Gratis Pada Usia Sekolah Dasar di Desa Kunci. Jurnal Bagimu Negeri, 1(2), 79-83.

Salimi, M., Susiani, T. S., & Hidayah, R. (2017). Based Learning Sebagai Alternatif Model Pembelajaran di Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan. JPsd (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar), 3(1), 1-9.

Saripudin, D., Komalasari, K., & Anggraini, D. N. (2021). Value-Based Digital Storytelling Learning Media to Foster Student Character. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 369-384.

Sholihah, F., Suyitno, H., & Dwijanto. (2020). Creative Mathematical Thinking Ability in Creative Problem-Solving Model Viewed from Gender. Journal of Primary Education, 9(1), 58-65.

Sukestiyarno, Y. L. (2015). Pengembangan Kurikulum Pembelajaran Matematika SMA terintegrasi Pendidikan Karakter dengan Asesmen Proyek Secara Berjenjang dengan Sistem Spiral. UNNES Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2).

Suriyah, P., Anshori, A., Ospa, A. Z., Rahmawati, R., Abidah, A., & Pramana, R. D. (2021). Degree of Graph Theory as A Tool to Grow Creative Thinking Ability in Fluency Indicator. Prosiding Nasional Pendidikan: LPPM IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro, 2(1), 232-235.

Suriyah, P., Dewi, E. P., Nurhayati, E., Maulidiyawati, M., Qomariyah, R., & Muti'ah, S. (2021). Isomorfik Graf sebagai Alat untuk Membiasakan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif pada Indikator Fluency. Prosiding Nasional Pendidikan: LPPM IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro, 2(1), 123-127.

Suriyah, P., Indriani, A., Novianti, D. E., & Rohman, N. (2018). Media Pembelajaran Inovatif House Of Multiplication Bagi Siswa Sdn Sidorejo Sebagai Upaya Hitung Cepat Perkalian. J-ADIMAS (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat), 6(2).

Suriyah, P., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Usodo, B. (2017). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif STAD With Guided Discovery Learning Pada Materi Pokok Lingkaran Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ). Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(3).

Suriyah, P., Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, R., & Wardono, W. (2020). Graph theory as A tool for growing mathematical creativity. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 7(1), 51-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v7i1.744

Suriyah, P., Waluya, S.T., Dwijanto, & Rosyida, I. (2022). Construction Of Mathematics Problem-Based On APOS Theory To Encourage Reflective Abstraction Viewed From Students’ Creative Thinking Profile. Journal of Positive School, 6(9), 1290-1309.

Suriyah, P., Zainudin, M., & Yektiana, S. (2021). Pedagogical compentence of mathematics education lectures using LMS (Learning Management System) moodle in the era Covid-19. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v7i1.15847

Thohir, M. A., Jumadi, J., & Warsono, W. (2022). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service science teachers: A Delphi study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 127-142.

Utami, A. D., & Suriyah, P. (2017). Strategi Guru Dalam Membelajarkan Matematika Terkait Pengetahuan Konseptual Kepada Anak Tunanetra. Jurnal Derivat, 2(1), 11-23.

Voogt J, Fisser P, Tondeur J, van Braak J. (2016). Using theoretical perspectives in developing understanding of TPACK. In: Heering MC, Koehler MJ, Mishra P (eds) Handbook of technological pedagogical and content knowledge for educators. Routledge, New York, NY, p 33e52.

Wahyudi, Waluya, S.B., Suyitno, H., & Isnarto. (2019). The Use Of 3CM (Cool-Critical-Creative-Meaningful) Model in Blended Learning to Improve Creative Thinking Ability In Solving Mathematics Problem. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST) 5 (1), 26-38.

Wei CAI1, Xiaodong WEN2, Kejian CAI3, Zhongda LV. (2019). Measure and Improvement Path of TPACK Context of Professional Teachers of Civil Engineering in Higher Education. SSN: 1583-3410 (print), ISSN: 1584-5397. Expert Projects Publishing House. Revista de cercetare și intervenție socială. vol. 65, pp. 276-291.

Widyawati, T. D. (2010). Pembelajaran Berbasis Riset. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Zwart, D. P., Van Luit, J. E., Noroozi, O., & Goei, S. L. (2017). The effects of digital learning material on students’ mathematics learning in vocational education. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1313581.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 MAJALAH LONTAR

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.