Abstract
Primary schools have a central role in the formation of young individuals and set an important foundation for their progress in the educational process. One of the main approaches in the elementary school context is integrated learning. This approach provides students with the opportunity to learn through themes that integrate various scientific disciplines in one learning series. Recent changes in primary school policy in Indonesia have raised concerns regarding teachers' understanding and implementation of these practices. This article outlines the concept and urgency of a deep understanding of integrated learning, which includes its four main strengths: active student involvement, holistic approach, authenticity, and meaningfulness in learning. This also explains the potential of integrated learning as a scientific background for teachers at the elementary school level. Even though education policies are constantly changing, this article emphasizes the importance of maintaining the continuity of integrated learning. Government policy support is key. This article also discusses the management of AI support as a solution to the challenges of implementing integrated learning policies in Indonesia. By utilizing AI, educators can anticipate and optimize the characteristics and advantages of integrated learning so that it is more efficient and impactful.
References
Aini, D. F. N. (2018). SELF ESTEEM PADA ANAK USIA SEKOLAH DASAR UNTUK PENCEGAHAN KASUS BULLYING. Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pengembangan Sekolah Dasar (JP2SD), 6(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.22219/jp2sd.v6i1.5901
Aka, K. A., & Afandi, A. N. H. (2023). Urgensi Pendekatan Pembelajaran Tematik-Terpadu pada Era Vuca: Tantangan di Sekolah Dasar. SEMDIKJAR (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran), 2000–2011. https://proceeding.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/semdikjar/article/view/4029
Akgün, S., & Greenhow, C. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Addressing Ethical Challenges in K-12 Settings. Ai and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
Alexiadou, N., & Lange, B. (2013). Deflecting European Union Influence on National Education Policy-Making: The Case of the United Kingdom. Journal of European Integration. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2012.661423
Ashwin, P., & Smith, K. (2014). Researcher Creations? The Positioning of Policy Texts in Higher Education Research. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9819-9
Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum Integration: Designing the Core of Democratic Education. Teachers College Press.
Beroš, I. (2020). Digital Citizenship in Croatia: Analysis of Strategic Documents of the National Education Policy and the Citizenship Education Curricula. https://doi.org/10.33422/2nd.iacetl.2020.12.18
Bhagwandas, K. K. (2020). Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications-a Vision Using the SPSS Method. RMC. https://doi.org/10.46632/rmc/1/3/3
Bhatt, P. K., & Muduli, A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Learning and Development: A Systematic Literature Review. European Journal of Training and Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-09-2021-0143
Bozkurt, A., Karadeniz, A., Bañeres, D., & Rodríguez, M. E. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Reflections From Educational Landscape: A Review of AI Studies in Half a Century. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020800
Brand, B. R., & Triplett, C. F. (2012). Interdisciplinary curriculum: an abandoned concept? Teachers and Teaching, 18(3), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.629847
Campbell, C., & Henning, M. B. (2010). Planning, teaching, and assessing elementary education interdisciplinary curriculum. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 179–186.
Chase, M. M. (2016). Culture, Politics, and Policy Interpretation. Educational Policy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814563382
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. Ieee Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2988510
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a Connected Research Agenda for CLIL Pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0
Drake, S. M. (2007). Creating Standards-Based Integrated Curriculum: Aligning Curriculum, Content, Assessment, and Instruction. In Corwin Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED495507&site=ehost-live%5Cnhttp://www.corwinpress.com/booksProdDesc.nav?prodId=Book227149
Drake, S. M., & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting Standards Through Integrated Curriculum. In Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. (2018). Integrated Curriculum as an Effective Way to Teach 21st Century Capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.30777/apjer.2018.1.1.03
Duran, E., Ballone Duran, L., & Worch, E. (2009). Papier-mache animals: An integrating theme for elementary classrooms. Science Education Review, 8(1), 19–29.
Eurydice. (2011). Science Education in Europe: National Policies, Practices and Research. https://doi.org/10.2797/7170
Fogarty, R. (2009). How to integrate the curricula (3rd ed.). Corwin.
Fraker, D. M. (1995). Improving high school students’ critical thinking skills. Masters(3), 49.
Gresnigt, R., Taconis, R., van Keulen, H., Gravemeijer, K., & Baartman, L. (2014). Promoting science and technology in primary education: a review of integrated curricula. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 47–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.877694
Hahn, R. A., & Truman, B. I. (2015). Education Improves Public Health and Promotes Health Equity. International Journal of Health Services. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731415585986
Harmon, D. A., & Jones, T. S. (2005). Elementary education: a reference handbook. ABC-CLIO.
Harry, A. (2023). Role of AI in Education. Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (Injurity). https://doi.org/10.58631/injurity.v2i3.52
Hashim, S., Omar, M. K., Jalil, H. A., & Sharef, N. M. (2022). Trends on Technologies and Artificial Intelligence in Education for Personalized Learning: Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v11-i1/12230
Hsu, T. C., Abelson, H., Lao, N., & Chen, S.-C. (2021). Is It Possible for Young Students to Learn the AI-STEAM Application With Experiential Learning? Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911114
Iasha, V., Rachmadtullah, R., & Rasmitadila, R. (2020). Improved Integrated Thematic Learning Process With Model Discovery Learning in Elementary School. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.11-12-2019.2290877
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation. In Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Jang, W. (2017). Elementary school first grade teachers’’ perception and actual conditions on theme-based integrated curriculum in elementary school : a focus group interview study [Chung-Ang University]. https://m.riss.kr/search/detail/ssoSkipDetailView.do?p_mat_type=be54d9b8bc7cdb09&control_no=fa584bdfd8c46670ffe0bdc3ef48d419#redirect
John, Y. J. (2015). A “New” Thematic, Integrated Curriculum for Primary Schools of Trinidad and Tobago: A Paradigm Shift. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n3p172
Jone, S. M., Barnes, S. P., Bailey, R., & Doolittle, E. J. (2017). Promoting social and emotional competencies in elementary school. Future of Children, 27(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2017.0003
Jones, C. (2009). Interdisciplinary Approach - Advantages, Disadvantages, and the Future Benefits of Interdisciplinary Studies. Essai, 7(1), 76–81.
Katz, L. G. (2003). Building a Good Fondation for Childern. In J. H. Helm & S. Beneke (Eds.), The Power of Projects: Meeting Contemporary Challenges in Early Childhood Classrooms - Strategies and Solutions (pp. 10–18). Teacher College Press.
Kim, W.-H., & Kim, J.-H. (2020). Individualized AI Tutor Based on Developmental Learning Networks. Ieee Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2972167
Kucirkova, N. (2019). Socio-Material Directions for Developing Empirical Research on Children’s E-Reading: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of the Literature Across Disciplines. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798418824364
Lei, W. (2020). Research on the Policy of Music Education in China. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200328.023
Liu, Y., Chen, L., & Yao, Z. (2022). The Application of Artificial Intelligence Assistant to Deep Learning in Teachers’ Teaching and Students’ Learning Processes. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929175
Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing Educational Technologies in the Age of AI: A Learning Sciences‐driven Approach. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861
Marsono, Yoto, Devi, M., & Mustakim, S. S. (2019). The Development of the Interdisciplinary Thematic Learning Model in Vocational Education. Proceedings of the 1st Vocational Education International Conference (VEIC 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191217.055
Mayer, R. E. (2016). What Should Be the Role of Computer Games in Education? Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215621311
McCowan, J. D., & Knapper, C. K. (2002). An integrated and comprehensive approach to engineering curricula, Part one: Objectives and general approach. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(6), 633–637.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan, Pub. L. No. 65 (2013).
Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia tentang Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum dalam Rangka Pemulihan Pembelajaran, Pub. L. No. 56/M/2022 (2022).
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan, Pub. L. No. 41 (2007).
Mills, M., Keddie, A., Renshaw, P., & Monk, S. (2016). The Politics of Differentiation in Schools. In The Politics of Differentiation in Schools. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757278
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 12 Tahun 2024 tentang Kurikulum pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah, 72 (2024).
Montagna, E., Guerreiro, J. R., & Torres, B. B. (2010). Biochemistry of the Envenomation Response—A Generator Theme for Interdisciplinary Integration. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20376
Mufaridah, M., Santoso, S., & Madjdi, A. H. (2020). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Tematik Kelas V SD Berbasis Kearifan Lokal untuk Pengenalan Budaya Sedan Rembang. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 4(3), 500. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v4i3.28488
Muhdi, M. (2019). Framework for Implementation of Education Policy in the Perspective of Education Management in Indonesia. Universal Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071220
Muñiz, R. (2021). Education Law and Policy in the Time of COVID-19: Using a Legal Framework to Expose Educational Inequity. Aera Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211054107
Niemelä, M. A. (2021). Subject Matter Specific Curriculum Integration: A Quantitative Study of Finnish Student Teachers’ Integrative Content Knowledge. Journal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1989288
Obi, L., Omotayo, T., Ekundayo, D., & Oyetunji, A. K. (2022). Enhancing BIM Competencies of Built Environment Undergraduates Students Using a Problem-Based Learning and Network Analysis Approach. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-05-2022-0085
Oudenampsen, J., de Pol, M. van, Blijlevens, N., & Das, E. (2023). Interdisciplinary Education Affects Student Learning: A Focus Group Study. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04103-9
Ouyang, F., Wu, M., Zheng, L., Zhang, L., & Jiao, P. (2023). Integration of Artificial Intelligence Performance Prediction and Learning Analytics to Improve Student Learning in Online Engineering Course. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00372-4
Pardamean, B., Suparyanto, T., Cenggoro, T. W., Sudigyo, D., & Anugrahana, A. (2022). AI-Based Learning Style Prediction in Online Learning for Primary Education. Ieee Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3160177
Semilarski, H., Soobard, R., & Rannikmäe, M. (2019). Modeling Students’ Perceived Self-Efficacy and Importance Toward Core Ideas and Work and Life Skills in Science Education. Science Education International. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i4.3
Seow, P.-S., Pan, G., & Koh, G. (2019). Examining an experiential learning approach to prepare students for the volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) work environment. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.12.001
Septiana, N., Rohmadi, M., Nasir, M., Nastiti, L. R., Usmiyatun, U., & Riswanto, R. (2018). KESULITAN MENGAJAR IPA TERPADU GURU IPA SMP/MTs DI KALIMANTAN TENGAH. Edu Sains Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika. https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v6i1.716
Setiawan, A., Fajaruddin, S., Harun, M. H., Sumiyati, Y., Nartani, C. I., & Fitriana, F. (2020). Character Values In The Thematic Learning Of Elementary School. Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Pendidikan, 29(2), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.17977/um009v29i22020p158
Shah, P., Kendall, F., Khozin, S., Goosen, R., Hu, J., Laramie, J. M., Ringel, M., & Schork, N. J. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Clinical Development: A Translational Perspective. NPJ Digital Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0148-3
Silver, H. F., Strong, R. W., & Perini, M. J. (2000). So Each May Learn: Integrating Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences. Integrating Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences, 134. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED449130%0Apapers3://publication/uuid/2501D228-2013-4B74-A53D-BA534E89E7B2
Şimşek, A. (2008). Tarih Derslerinde Bütünsel Öğrenme: Gestaltçı Yaklaşımdan Holistik Yaklaşıma Bir Bakış Denemesi. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 1–16.
Stidder, G., & Hayes, S. (2010). Thematic learning and teaching through physical education. In G. Stidder & S. Hayes (Eds.), The Really Useful Physical Education Book (1st Editio, p. 17). Routledge.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How To Differentiate instruction In Academically Calssrooms. ASCD.
Turner, R., Cotton, D., Morrison, D., & Kneale, P. (2022). Embedding Interdisciplinary Learning Into the First-Year Undergraduate Curriculum: Drivers and Barriers in a Cross-Institutional Enhancement Project. In Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2056834
Walter, S. G., & Block, J. (2016). Outcomes of Entrepreneurship Education: An Institutional Perspective. Journal of Business Venturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.10.003
Wang, X., Xia, L., Bales, C., Zhang, X., Copertaro, B., Pan, S., & Wu, J. (2020). A Systematic Review of Recent Air Source Heat Pump (ASHP) Systems Assisted by Solar Thermal, Photovoltaic and Photovoltaic/Thermal Sources. Renewable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.096
Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What Kind of Citizen? The Politics of Educating for Democracy. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237
Widyaningrum, R. (2012). MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEMATIK DI MI/SD. Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 10(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.21154/cendekia.v10i1.405
Wilcox, S. M. (2022). Queering School Leadership Preparation Curricula for Gender Justice in Public Schooling. Journal of School Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846221149213
Young, S. J., Piché, P. G., & Jones, G. A. (2020). Student pathways and differentiation policies in Ontario: are they compatible? Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 4(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2019.1679662
Zhou, D., Liu, Y., Huang, J., Xiang, Y., Gu, R., & Liu, B. (2023). An Intelligent Tutoring System Enhancing Transdisciplinary Problem-Finding in Design-Led Integrated STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-040-4_142