Keywords
digital learning
higher education
synchronous
asynchronous
How to Cite
Abstract
Hybrid digital learning has gained prominence as an innovative approach to enhancing student achievement in motor learning courses within physical education (PE) programs. This study explores the effectiveness of combining synchronous and asynchronous learning sessions to improve students development and performance. In traditional PE courses, students often face challenges in mastering information gained due to the limitations of face-to-face instruction and the varying pace at which individuals learn. The hybrid model, which integrates real-time, instructor-led sessions with flexible, self-paced online learning modules, offers a more dynamic and personalized educational experience. Through synchronous sessions, students benefit from live interaction with instructors, enabling immediate feedback and the opportunity to engage in real-time discussions. Asynchronous sessions, on the other hand, provide students with the flexibility to review course materials, and complete assignments at their own pace, reinforcing learning outside the classroom. This dual approach accommodates different learning styles, encourages self-directed learning, and helps students develop cognitive of motor learning. The study examines the impact of this hybrid learning format on student achievement in motor learning courses, focusing on factors such as cognitive development and student engagement. The findings suggest that students who participated in the hybrid model showed significant improvements in motor skill performance and better retention of learned techniques compared to those in traditional, fully in-person courses. Additionally, the hybrid format promoted greater student self-regulation and allowed for individualized learning, making the course more inclusive and accessible. This research highlights the potential of hybrid digital learning to revolutionize motor learning in physical education, providing a flexible, effective, and engaging approach to developing motor skills and enhancing student outcomes in the digital age.
References
Aguirre, T., Aperribai, L., Cortabarría, L., Verche, E., & Borges, Á. (2022). Challenges for Teachers’ and Students’ Digital Abilities: A Mixed Methods Design Study. Sustainability, 14(8), 4729. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084729
Ahlgren, R., Häkkinen, S., & Eskola, A. (2020). SUCCESS FACTORS FOR HYBRID TEACHING. 2215–2219. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2020.0683
Alenezi, M., Wardat, S., & Akour, M. (2023). The Need of Integrating Digital Education in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Sustainability, 15(6), 4782. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064782
Althubyani, A. R. (2024). Digital Competence of Teachers and the Factors Affecting Their Competence Level: A Nationwide Mixed-Methods Study. Sustainability, 16(7), 2796. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072796
Cai, D., & Chen, W. (2024). Research on Challenges and Optimization Suggestions for Digital Transformation of Education in China (pp. 255–261). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-253-8_31
Ding, L., & Wu, S. (2024). Digital Transformation of Education in China: A Review Against the Backdrop of the 2024 World Digital Education Conference. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 20(2), 3283–3299. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.24.re340
Goyal, S. (2012). E-Learning: Future of Education. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 6(4), 239. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v6i4.168
Hadiati, E., Dwiyanto, A., Setianingrum, D. A., & Amroini, A. Z. (2023). Hybrid Learning: Analysis of Transformation of Islamic Education in Digital Era. International Journal of Islamic Studies Higher Education, 2(2), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.24036/insight.v2i2.116
İnal, Ö., Özkan, E., & Göktaş, A. (2023). The effect of attention control and academic motivation on perceived learning in hybrid occupational therapy education. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 86(8), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226231172333
Jeong, S.-H., & Chung, J.-Y. (2023). University Students’ Satisfaction and Evaluations of Synchronous Online Learning for Physical Education Courses. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 12(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0057
Kantcheva, R. B., & Bickle, E. (2023). Inclusive learning development practices: the consequences of flexibility and choice in the hybrid era. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 26. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi26.886
Kurniawati, D., & Mardiningrum, A. (2022). Students’ Strategies and Challenges to Understand Materials in Asynchronous Learning. Proceedings Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta Undergraduate Conference, 2(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.18196/umygrace.v2i1.414
Lu, C. Y., & Chen, B. T. (2011). The Potential for Active Online Learning in Taiwanese Tourism Degree Programs Based on Online Educational Experiences of Graduate Students. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 11(3), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2011.597635
Mallon, S., Richards, C., & Rixon, A. (2023). Student and teacher experiences of online synchronous learning. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(5), 1688–1705. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2022-0011
Mariati, N. K. S., Artini, L. P., & Marsakawati, N. P. E. (2022). Students’ Perception of Blended Learning at Junior High School (Combination of Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning). IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(2), 1235–1245. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i2.3034
Melnyk, M., Blyznyukov, A., & Cieślik, J. (2023). The impact of digital education initiatives. SocioEconomic Challenges, 7(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.61093/sec.7(3).1-9.2023
Moustakas, L., & Robrade, D. (2022). The Challenges and Realities of E-Learning during COVID-19: The Case of University Sport and Physical Education. Challenges, 13(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe13010009
Northey, G., Bucic, T., Chylinski, M., & Govind, R. (2015). Increasing Student Engagement Using Asynchronous Learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 37(3), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475315589814
Ogla, R. A. S., & Mohammed, J. (2016). Implement Interactive E-Learning System Based on Cloud Computing. Engineering and Technology Journal, 34(6B), 786–796. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.34.6B.8
Oguguo, B. C. E., Ocheni, C. A., & Adebayo, F. K. (2021). STUDENTS` ACHIEVEMENT IN ONLINE TEST AND MEASUREMENT COURSE IN SYNCHRONOUS AND ASYNCHRONOUS E-LEARNING PLATFORM. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v6i2.3966
Osman, S. Z. M. (2022). Combining Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning: Student Satisfaction with Online Learning using Learning Management Systems. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 9(3), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v9i3.4103
Palmer, R. H., Moulton, M. K., Stone, R. H., Lavender, D. L., Fulford, M., & Phillips, B. B. (2022). The impact of synchronous hybrid instruction on students’ engagement in a pharmacotherapy course. Pharmacy Practice, 20(1), 2611–2611. https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2022.1.2611
Presley, R. G., Cumberland, D. M., & Rose, K. (2023). A Comparison of Cognitive and Social Presence in Online Graduate Courses: Asynchronous vs. Synchronous Modalities. Online Learning, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3046
Rijst, R. Van Der, Guo, P., & Admiraal, W. (2023). Student engagement in hybrid approaches to teaching in higher education. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 41(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.562521
Robertsone, G., & Lapina, I. (2022). Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Drivers, Success Factors, Benefits and Challenges. Human, Technologies and Quality of Education, 2022, 152–168. https://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2022.11
Rozi, F., Putri, M. W., & Wijaya, M. R. A. (2021). E-Learning System For Physical Education In IAIN Salatiga Using Google Classroom. EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 3(2), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i2.268
Sari, I. N. (2023). Effectiveness of Implementing Synchronous and Asynchronous Blended E-Learning in Stunting Prevention and Treatment Training Programs. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 25(1), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v25i1.34951
Tarazi, A., & Ortega-Martín, J. L. (2023). Enhancing EFL students’ engagement in online synchronous classes: The role of the Mentimeter platform. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127520
Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2021). Transitioning to E-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: How have Higher Education Institutions responded to the challenge? Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6401–6419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10633-w
VanLeeuwen, C. A., Veletsianos, G., Belikov, O., & Johnson, N. (2020). Institutional Perspectives on Faculty Development for Digital Education in Canada. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27944
Yadav, S. K., Para, S., Singh, G., Gupta, R., Sarin, N., & Singh, S. (2021). Comparison of asynchronous and synchronous methods of online teaching for students of medical laboratory technology course. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10(1), 232. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1022_20
Yulitriana. (2021). Synchronous or Asynchronous: Students’ Perceptions on Online Learning During the Pandemic. EBONY: Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 1(1), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.37304/ebony.v1i1.3101
Zhu, Y., Zuo, H., & Chen, Y. (2024). Digital Transformation in Vocational Education: Challenges, Strategies, and an Experimental Proposal (pp. 643–650). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-242-2_79
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Asosiasi Pengelola Publikasi Ilmiah Perguruan Tinggi PGRI